One Lump Or Two

April 15th, 2009

You guys didn’t really think I was done with this whole teabagging thing, did you? Seriously? When the barely-literate right decides to stage a protest that, at best, sounds like they’re sitting around a table with petticoats and parasols and at worst sounds like something you have to pay an extra fifty bucks for, I simply lack the self control (and the desire) to leave things alone.

Now, the left would like to believe that absolutely no one showed up to teabag today, and that’s just not true. It was no million man march. . . hell, it wasn’t even a thousand man march, but most of the events turned up several hundred people. Those aren’t great numbers considering the fact that Fox News essentially turned into Teabag Central over the past week, but remember. This is the grass roots astroturf right we’re talking about. They’re pretty new to this whole “doing more than bitching about it at work” thing.

As I said yesterday, I remember 2002 and 2003. Everybody starts somewhere. Hell, I work with a few teabaggers. I didn’t even know it until lunch, in fact. They’re nice enough people, as long as you don’t ask them what country they think the President was born in. And I’ve long since made it a point not to talk politics with them because it just creates too much workplace tension when I grind their talking points into a fine, grey paste.

So like I said, this whole thing wasn’t a complete flop for the right. And the left is always going to paint it as a disaster no matter how it turns out. So I decided to try out something I’d ordinarily never punish myself with. My nerves steeled, I turned to Fox News to see how they were spinning all of this teabagging. And I have to tell you. . . anyone who is worried about these protests can rest assured that nothing significant was accomplished today. No groundwork was laid down. While the body count was significant, the brain count was effectively nil.

The right, it seems suffers from many of the same pains that the left used to (and sometimes still does) suffer from. The first is a lack of message discipline. Now, I’m not talking about the actual GOP. They’ve always run a tighter operation than the Democrats, and they have Reagan and later Gingrich to thank for that. But until public distaste for Bush was boiling up into over the 50% mark, most of the left-wing events that I attended felt like a pot luck of personal issues. The right has managed to take that to an entirely new level.

As far as I can tell, the teabaggers are upset that Barack Obama is a socialist, terrorist, fascist, muslim, abortion performing, immoral icon of the antichrist who is going to cause America to surrender by taxing the middle class  at a 150% rate, making everyone marry an illegal gay Mexican, and melting down all of our guns so he can use the metal to build concentration camps where our children will be sent to work in the ACORN mines. I might have missed some of the subtext there, but it’s kind of hard to read all of those signs when your eyes are watering up with laughter.

To be honest, I don’t think most of the teabaggers have any idea what they are protesting. It certainly isn’t taxation – I’ve yet to see a single person at any of those rallies that will be pulling in more than a quarter million a year. And it certainly isn’t socialism, since I don’t think most of them could define it without a trip to the publicly funded library to look it up. The truth is that all this teabagging is just one great big conservative hissy-fit about being out of power. I mean, really. Obama’s been the President for less than half a year. He hasn’t even had time to fuck anything up yet. Hell, it took his predecessor longer than that to really screw the country over, and that guy was a freakin’ expert.

Some of them claim they are protesting government spending, inflated deficits and unbalanced budgets. Others say they  are worried about the government having too much control over their lives or being too invasive of their privacy. And many of them are protesting under some catch-all banner about America being in crisis. Well, they’re all full of shit, cause I didn’t see any of them out there teabagging for the past eight years.

The only thing they have to be upset about is that their own party screwed the pooch so badly that they’re out of power now. And rather than turning to their former leaders and asking them what in the blue hell they were doing since the new millennium came around (which is what the left did with the Democrats when they were tired of getting their asses kicked), they are taking out their frustrations and their loathing on the man that stomped them so very, very hard last November. It’s Obama’s fault, you see, because he had the nerve to actually win an election.

And you know what? That’s fine. If they don’t like that they lost the election, they have the right to say so. They even have the right to protest the fact, technically. Although it’s a damn stupid thing to protest, since what they’re upset about is a matter of opinion. So let them go out there and march mill around aimlessly against their own disenfranchisement. Let them grumble and scream and caterwail like colicky infants on a twelve hour non-stop flight. The rest of the country will respond in turn.

Atlas Teabagged

April 14th, 2009

You know, part of me almost feels bad for the politically disenfranchised right wing. Hell, I remember six or seven years ago when my world view was generally seen as crazy or irrelevant. I remember the opposition party chortling to themselves about their “permanent majority” (and I do hope the Democrats learn from their mistake). I remember when way more than 65% of the country firmly backed a President that I was sure would lead us into a downward spiral of ruin and disaster. Then I remember that no one is sending the thin-skinned right wingers any death threats or calling them unAmerican traitors, and I suddenly I don’t feel so bad for them anymore. Funny that.

But I do know where they’re coming from. I remember feeling ideologically abandoned by my countrymen, to the point where I hardly wanted anything to do with them. So I understand the whole “Going Galt” meme. For those of you that are unaware, “Going Galt” is a reference to the mysterious yet crucial character from Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. John Galt is just about the richest, smartest, most industrious and ingenious man on the face of the Earth. He and his merry but generally disassociated band of do-it-yourself’ers decide that they are sick and tired of all the hangers-on and the crybabies demanding a slice of their hard earned pie. So one day, he just up and disappears, because he would rather vanish without a trace than work to support the lazy, worthless masses.

All of the other brilliant and talented industrialists follow suit, and their absence throws the entire world into disarray. Because without their inexplicable awesomeness, always present to tell the other 99% how to live their lives, the rest of us poor suckers are lost in a hazy doldrum of pointless existence. Without Galt and his caste of upper-echelon makers and doers, the rest of the world lacks a teat to suck on. Low and behold, we all learn the error of our ways and come to respect those who propped us up. Only at the end of the novel does John Galt re-emerge to end the suffering of the tiny-brained working class by re-structuring all of society into a calculated applause machine whose affections are permanently affixed on Galt’s sheer genius.

You want to talk about a self-aggrandizing masturbation fantasy? You just can’t beat Atlas Shrugged. Never before (and hopefully never again) will the rights of the privileged and the pompous be so thoroughly defended in their privilege and pomposity through such tedious and repetitive prose. I’ve spared you the fake mysticism and the badly arranged pseudo-science, and more or less spoiled the book at this point. But that’s only true in as much as one can actively spoil something that is already fetid with willful exaggeration and childish, intentional stupidity.

So beloved is Atlas Shrugged on the economic right (Alan Greenspan worshiped at the altar for most of his adult life) that, for a tiny, hilarious blip on the social radar, people started actually talking about “Going Galt”. Notice that I said they were talking about it, as opposed to actually doing it. In the end, no one went Galt because not a single Objectivist was willing to put his money where his mouth was. Because the entire philosophy is just one big rationalization for “poor, successful me”. Because even the true believers know, deep down, that they love money far more than they love their ideals. Either that or they know they’re full of shit. I’m open to either possibility.

Even those who actively, publicly called for people to Go Galt were full of shit. John Galt didn’t make his great big (fifty-six page long) speech before he disappeared. He just up and vanished. And the gap that he left in the workings of the world was evidence in his absence. Yet Michelle Malkin and her ilk didn’t just up and disappear (though I pine for the day, I really do). No, Malkin stuck around, cheerleading for everyone else to take a stand. Possibly because deep down she knows she doesn’t produce anything useful to society in the first place. But more likely because that’s where the easy money was.

And in a lot of ways, that’s the real trouble with Atlas Shrugged. It fails to realize that while there are a few prodigies and genuine geniuses out there shaping the world, there are ten times as many capable, intelligent people waiting in the wings. In its own absurd way, it fellates unfettered capitalism without acknowledging one of its core tenants. In a truly free and open market, if one person cannot or will not produce, another will gladly fill their spot and collect the wealth that could have been theirs.

So, back to our emotionally battered right wing. I said earlier that I understand their rejection of the countrymen that seem to be rejecting them. I remember that phase. For me, it lasted a few days after the election. For others, I guess it lingers a bit. But I also understand another need. The need for relevance. The need to roll up your sleeves and change the direction of the nation itself. When you realize that you cannot or will not abandon something you’re invested in, and you decide to take hold of it and make it your own again.

And as those sorts of movements go, the left did an amazing job. The resurgence of individually-powered politics and, dare I say it, populism in this country between Bush’s first term and the present day still leaves me a bit staggered and breathless. I watched as the left grew out of their anger (but not out of their outrage). I watched them organize, mobilize, and hold their party’s feet to the fire.

Yes, there were protests and marches and grand, media-grasping gestures. But there was also a lot of political footwork. There was time donated to causes and leaders we could genuinely respect. There was also money donated – so much that it rivaled the standard wholesale purchasing of politicians that is so repugnantly present in both political parties. It wasn’t just idle foot stomping and tantrum throwing. It was measured, decisive action. And hey, some of it worked, some of it didn’t. But today our President is Barack Obama instead of John McCain or Willard M. Romney or even Hillary Clinton. And anyone who was paying attention knows that it was the individual wills of many rather than the presumed logic of the failure-proned Democratic leadership that helped him get there.

So here we are, three months into the Obama Presidency, and the right is absolutely sure that the sky is falling, ACORN is wire-tapping their call phones, and that the government is going to give their guns to terrorists and their paychecks to welfare queens. Socialism is descending on their lives like some throwback McCarthy boogeyman, and they’re not going to take this shit sitting down!

They’re going to throw a Tea Party.

No, for reals. Actually, they’re going to throw a lot of Tea Parties. All over the country, in fact. Yes, in the spirit of the Boston Tea Party, and I’m using the word “spirit” loosely here, the wingiest and the nuttiest of the wingnuts are organizing protests and marches on April 15th – tax day – and rallying against the forces of Evil Obama Socialism. Of course, instead of engaging in acts of genuine protest they’re going to march down the streets waving tea bags  in their hands. Just like our founding fathers, I tells ya! And I’m sure once they take about ten minutes per person to explain to every onlooker what their gesture is intended to represent, the general public will be very impressed. You know. Once they get done making “teabagging” jokes.

Aww, who am I kidding? I’m never going to be done making “teabagging” jokes.

Rush Almighty

March 6th, 2009

So, is Rush Limbaugh the defacto leader of the Republican Party? Personally, I don’t know if I care or not. Since their choices seem reduced to either completely sack-less leadership or batshit-crazy leadership, either way it’s a win for me. I am enjoying the sight of the party in a desperate scramble for meaning and significance. It’s almost as if they don’t know they’re completely and utterly in the minority now. A crippling election has come and gone, and they still seem to think that the majority of Americans trust them to fix the financial crisis. They still believe that “bipartisan” means the Democrats caving in to their every demand. They still trot out that tired, never-ran cliche of socialism as if the American public hasn’t failed to be terrified by it the last few thousand times. And they still blame the Democratic party for all that is wrong in the world, from the failing economy to the cost of health care – the GOP even seems to think the Democrats are responsible for the clusterfuck their own party has become.

The right can push these absurd meme that it’s some kind of Obama / Reid / Pelosi/ Carville conspiracy that elevated Rush to his faux leadership role within the GOP, but it’s just not true. There were a few factors that allowed Rush to gain so much clout within the party’s base. The biggest one is that the party doesn’t really have any leadership. They ran a weak Presidential candidate, chosen from an entire field of bullshit-weak candidates. Their supposed diamond in the rough is back up in Alaska, blissfully being forgotten by the majority of America. The minority leaders in Congress are both laughably unable to deliver leadership, and are selling a bill of goods that the country just isn’t buying.

Oh, and there’s the fact that Rush appeals to the absolute wing-nuttiest of the wingnuts. He’s certainly got that going for him.

But this idea that it’s an orchestrated effort between the Democrats and the media to cause tension between Rush and the supposed Republican leadership is absurd. It wasn’t the Democrats that put him on the air, or cowtowed to his lunatic rantings. Barack Obama didn’t enlist Rush to be a key speaker at the Conservative Political Action Conference this past week (where he received an award, I believe, for  outstanding achievement in the field of excellence). And unless I missed some very creating video editing, James Carville wasn’t responsible for Michael Steele’s on-air fellating of Limbaugh after he dared to assert that Rush is an entertainer, and a crude one at that.

No no, boys. The Republicans own this one. They have only themselves to blame both for their inability to inspire their constituents and for their willingness to use Limbaugh as such a useful tool. A reliable attack dog who could say the sorts of hideous things that elected politicians never could. No one on the right minded when Rush defended eight years of the Worst President Ever, because it was convenient to let someone else do that dirty job. Hell, even Rush admitted afterwards that he was “carrying water” for Bush. Live on his show, no less. They invited a selfish, beligerent junkie into their homes, and now they’re surprised that he’s shitting all over the living room carpet.

Must be more of that “politics of personal responsibility” we’ve seen so much of over the past decade.

The Good Doctor

February 20th, 2009


Hunter S. Thompson
 
Never turn your back on fear.
It should always be in front of you,
like a thing that might have to be killed.
 
Hunter Stockton Thompson
7/18/37 – 2/20/05



The Reboot Fetish

February 12th, 2009

There’s been a very disturbing trend throughout virtually all forms of entertainment media in the past few years known as the “reboot”. I can’t lock down exactly when this rather unimaginative and jargon-y term became mainstream, though I suspect it had a lot to do with Chris Nolan’s fantastically successful Batman Begins. And to it’s credit, Batman Begins was a genuine reboot. It took a concept and basic outline that just about all people are familiar with and completely re-wrote it in a creative and modern way. It sought, as much as one can do with a “superhero” movie, to leave behind the more childish aspects of the material and present movie goers with something truly interesting. Of course, by that definition, Tim Burton’s Batman would also have been a reboot, but no one called it that at the time outside of Hollywood because the term “reboot” hadn’t become shorthand for “making lots of money” yet. Ah, good times.

Any-old-how, rebooting a franchise now means something slightly different. Essentially, it means dredging up some old crap people are tired of and trying to get them to pay to be disappointed again. They called Superman Returns a reboot when it was, in fact, a sequel to Superman II (correctly leaving the third and fourth movies in some alternate Universe of Suck, Richard Pryor excluded). And now the gaming industry has gotten a hold of the “reboot” concept and, as with anything they borrow from the film industry, somehow made it ten times worse.

I mention all of this because I’ve just played through Tomb Raider: Underworld (which is on sale for $40 at Target right now), a game that got partially panned by critics for being, well, Tomb Raider. And to be clear, I was completely done with Lara Croft for a very long time, until Crystal Dynamics was handed the franchise. And what they did with Tomb Raider: Legend wasn’t a proper reboot per say, but rather just a new framework for an otherwise tired series. A framework, it should be noted, which actually contained a good game. And now the rumor is that Eidos wants a full on, proper reboot for Tomb Raider. Which is, of course, a very stupid idea.

Underworld itself was actually a fairly good game (minor character animation twitching aside). It wasn’t a 10, but it wasn’t a 6 or a 7 either, as I saw it so frequently scored. It wrapped up the story of Legend nicely, and it actually loaned some perspective to Crystal Dynamics’ decision to remake the original title as Tomb Raider: Anniversary (as Underworld ties those two plots together). While I admittedly feel like Underworld was a touch on the short side (they can go to hell selling me DLC that should have been on the disc) I will say that I enjoyed it quite a bit. The levels, while still linear, are a bit more experiment friendly in terms of finding alternate or even unintended paths. And they really nailed the feel and the fun of the series. I did feel that the game was a bit short on actual boss fights (read: there are none), but otherwise they crafted a fine addition to the franchise.

That all brings me back to the sudden desire to “reboot” Tomb Raider, and the aforementioned stupidity of that idea. Apparently Eidos is concerned that Underworld only sold 1.5 million copies. That’s by no means a meager sales record, but Tomb Raider as a franchise was expected to do better. That is, assuming you live in a bubble where you aren’t releasing your game right before the holidays up against every other new title on the market during one of the worst global financial clusterfucks in the past century.

Of course, other factors contributed to Underworld’s mediocre sales – such as the mediocre reviews. What I will say for Underworld is that it gets better the more you play it – with each level presenting a more interesting series of puzzles and scenarios. It probably didn’t help reviews too much to start the entire game with a prolonged, underwater swimming stage that, unless you’re a fucking psychic, will have you doddering around the ocean floor for a good half an hour until you psychicly find the hidden McGuffin required to open the first door in the game. But the thing is, aggrivating scenarios like that (and there are a few more. . . I’m looking at you, Belt Room) must be contrasted against the sprinting dash through a gravitationally irregular sinking barge or the sheer thrill of razing enemies later on in the game.

So I don’t think the problem is that Lara Croft herself has grown “stale”. As a matter of public record, I will officially state that hot, armed chicks with British accents are in no danger of ever going out of style. And the platforming itself is very solid. Plus, Underworld did something that game designers have been trying to figure out for about ten years now. They got rid of the quicktime events and replaced them with a situation where in you still have a hasty “reaction” based event, but you retain proper control of your character. It did surprise me a bit that that our stalwart crusader against “Press X To Not Die” game sequences, Yahtzee, reviewed Underworld without at least giving it that subtle nod.

But the core issue here is that, really, there isn’t enough of Tomb Raider to reboot it. The game is already pared down to its most basic concepts (a hot, armed British chick jumping from ledge to ledge) and the gameplay steps forward in almost all cases. If what you want to make is a game that isn’t Tomb Raider, and you feel that the franchise is an anchor, then make a new game. Uncharted for the PS3 borrows heavily from Tomb Raider (which originally borrowed from Indiana Jones, and which in turn has now borrowed from Uncharted), was a completely new IP on a poorly-selling exclusive platform, and it was a major success.

Now, maybe some executive was just talking out his ass and didn’t understand what “reboot” actually means when he was talking about the next Tomb Raider. If they are simply talking about a new plot arc, then it almost goes without saying (as Lara’s current plot arc ties up fairly well in Underworld). If they are saying we need to re-imagine the character and the setting, I just can’t see that going anywhere good. The truth is that for every one Dark Knight, there are about a hundred Extreme Ghostbuters. The failure rate on these sorts of reboots is both high and needlessly risky, especially considering the amazing job Crystal Dynamics did taking the Tomb Raider franchise from the abysmal crapfest that was Angel of Darkness and revitalizing it via Legend – all without having to reinvent the wheel.

Haxored

January 30th, 2009

Me thinks I am not entirely jerk-free here, still (well, aside from me). Since this entry keeps disappearing.

Clearing Brush

January 20th, 2009

So, the inauguration went off pretty much like everyone thought it would – first date jitters between Obama and Roberts aside. The harpy-toothed right will try to make noise about Obama’s oath. They’ll sight his middle name, since they’re still not over it after a year and a half. They’ll accuse him of thief’s guilt via his stammered, over anxious recitation – as if the far right has any ground to stand on in terms of their main man bungling his lines in public. And the tin foil hat brigade will claim that the variation of the Presidential oath means that Obama isn’t really the President – right after they remind us that his birth certificate was clearly photoshopped by time traveling al Queda agents.

His speech was mostly what I expected. I was surprised to hear him include non-believers in his littany of religious groups that need to come together. It was such a wonderful contrast to the hateful little tirade that one Williard M. Romney went on just about one year go. And his handling of race – specifically his race – was deft as ever. Managing to talk about his status as a minority in the country that elected him, segregation, slavery and racism without ever referring to himself (or anyone else) as “black” or “African-American”. I don’t know if it’s his way of refusing to create contrasts or if he’s just trying to avoid the out-of-context sound bite potential that our media loves to replay in place of actual news, but he executed it as well as he ever has.

There were times in the speech that he grew more forceful than I expected (and I welcomed them). He also grew a bit more flowery towards the end than I would have preferred. I understand that his speeches are a bit of poetry and a bit of performance art, but I felt like the last paragraph or so was crafted using some sort of Random Cliche Generator. But the thing that stuck out most in my mind about the speech was how he handled George W. Bush. He essentially thanked him for his service to our country, and then proceeded on to a list of ways that our country has gone straight to hell in the past eight years. It wasn’t quite the full-on Colbert, but it was a hell of a lot nicer than I would have been. Of course, I’m also not the President right now. Maybe those two things are related.

But on this day when I’m supposed to be celebrating The End of an Error, all I can think about is that bloody error of a man, grumping down into the collar of his coat, staring back at Barack Obama. All I can see is that stonewalled glare as Obama talked about the false choice between freedom and safety. I wonder if Bush is relieved. If it’s a load off of his mind to no longer have to worry about the burdens and responsibilities of office. If like every other endeavor he’s attempted over the course of his snake-bitten life, he’s happy to let someone else clean up his mess. After all, now he can go home to Kennebunkport (the ranch in Crawford is as much of a prop as the man who owns it), slip on his comfies, and try to figure out why David Letterman chuckles so hard whenever he sees a video clip of Bush trying to walk in a straight line.

And yet, he just isn’t disappearing down the memory hole quietly enough or quickly enough. Part of that has to do with his whirlwind Legacy Tour, where he and Cheney and Condi and that whole wacky, lovable crew you remember from their hit television show “Terrorists Are Going To Fucking Kill You” give interviews to every reporter and pundit that will feign interest long enough to let them speak. And their message is pretty much the same every time. History will vindicate them. The world will thank them. And seriously, y’all, it’s not torture if the prisoner doesn’t actually die.

When Bush is compared to Nixon, my heart swells. Not just because Bush is left to justify his existence against one of the worst Presidents in American history, but because he fails to do so. Even Nixon’s most vocal and unkind critics viewed Tricky Dick favorably in comparison. And truly, even if he could prove his primacy over Richard Nixon, there are no medals for second-to-last place. “Nixon was a professional politician, and I despised everything he stood for – but if he were running for president this year against the evil Bush-Cheney gang, I would happily vote for him.” – Hunter S. Thompson

This same Revisionist Army has tried to compare Bush to Truman and Lincoln (both Presidents who left office unpopular, but were vindicated later). The comparison to Truman is bad enough – Truman’s tenure in the White House was marked by the firm belief that no matter who had caused a problem, as President it was his responsibility to set things right. And whether he actually coined the phrase or not, “The Buck Stops Here” will be forever associated with Harry Truman. Bush, by contrast, never came across a problem that was either his fault for causing or his job to fix. From 9/11 to the phantom Iraqi WMDs to the drowning of New Orleans to the meltdown of our economy to the torture of prisoners in American custody, Bush was mysteriously never culpable. Nor did he ever make any efforts to correct the crises of his Presidency with even the slightest whiff of competency.

But to compare a cretin like Bush to a giant like Lincoln is just beyond the pale. I’m going on record right now and predicting that, in a century’s time, no one will be using the nickname “Honest Bush”. At his lowest, Bush excuses his excesses by comparing them to the excesses of Lincoln’s Presidency, and justifies them similarly. Now with all due respect to those that have fought and served and sacrificed over the past seven years, anyone who suggests that some backwards bunch of brainwashed holy warriors scheming in the mountains of Afghanistan threatened the stability of our country on the same level as the Civil War needs to walk the cemetery at Gettysburg and realize that those hoary stones mark a just fraction of the good men wasted in three short days of combat.

There is no need to wait for history to obscure the details in a battle fog of conflicting punditry and rosy nostalgia. George W. Bush was, is and forever will be a miserable failure, from his ape-gait lumber to his spoiled child certainty to his ghastly inability to refrain from smirking when invoking the memory of the dead. But worse than that, he was an empty-headed creature. A pseudo-folksy front man for a band of Pollyanna armchair generals who see the world as their own personal political rutting ground. Men who thought the domino theory that worked so bloody well in Vietnam was worth trying again – only this time in reverse and in a region far less stable. Not that any of them were around to see the domino theory in action. Like Dick Cheney, they all had other priorities.

So consider this my grand goodbye to George W. Bush. The man who single handedly made Presidential elections a two-year affair, born from the public’s urgent desire for a real leader. The man who forced us to laugh, though never with him. The man who cast America before the eyes of the world as a self-righteous, egomaniacal bully. The man who rode this country through an agonizing eight-year slow-motion T.J. Kong bomb drop of ignorant, warmongering insanity.

He will not be missed.

On Senators

January 4th, 2009

So, I don’t really think I need to go into some great big diatribe about Rod Blagojevich. He’s a charlatan and a crook, and he’s lucky that we are a nation of laws, because that means that his punishment will not include being strung up in downtown Chicago and beaten to death with flaming, barbed wire baseball bats. That he insists on carrying on as if he’s still a legitimate leader is symptomatic of our times. We live in a kingdom of shamelessness, where there is no such thing as disgrace or dignity, only jeuvenile foot stomping and, apparently, seven dollar haircuts. When acting like a whore, whether it’s in Hollywood or Washington or Chi-town, is apparently enough to keep your name in the press.

And I’m not at all impressed with Blago’s “brilliant” bit of strategy, selecting a second rate public servant with no personal integrity to fill Obama’s spot in some callous attempt to play the race card. Yep. Burris is black. And no, I don’t give a shit. He’s unfit to take the position, and the reasoning is very simple. Any person who would willingly accept Rod Blagojevich’s offer, knowing what sickly corruption his administration functions beneath, is unfit to serve in the Senate. Any man that lacks the integrity or the common bloody sense to say, “No, I won’t be a part of this!” is unfit to fill the seat. And don’t scoff. Rumor has it that Burris was Blago’s third pick, because the first two turned him down rather than sully their names. Add to that the fact that Burris went from being outraged to being willing to let the courts decide whether he should be outraged about the seat selling in the first place, and you know what? Fuck Ronald Burris. Even for a politician, that’s an amazing lack of class.

On the sunny side of the Senate, it looks like Norm Coleman, a man who looks so unelectably sleazy I wouldn’t even leave him in the same room as other peoples’ daughters, is going to be packing up his shit and moving back home to Minnesota, because Al Franken squeaked by at the end of the recount. There are still some legal hoops Coleman can make Franken jump through, but the deal is essentially done. Fraken is a senator, and Coleman is a has-been. I hope it burns that he lost to a guy who has pictures of himself wearing a fuzzy, pink bunny suit on the internet.

And I hope Franken keeps on being Franken, because as sarcastic as he can be as a comic, I’ve heard the man talk politics and he’s for real. In fact, I’ve heard him give a first rate schooling to plenty a pundit and representative that thought they were safe behind a carefully crafted wall of empty talking points. And that’s the reason I want to see him in the Senate. Because the man is a fastidious bullshit detector, and he gets more than a “this supports my side” understanding of the details before he opens his mouth. And for all the talk of “outsider-ism”, he truly is an outsider in terms of the political system in Washington. And if nothing else, his election to public office probably gave Bill O’Rielly another ulcer. And that’s something I’m sure we can all take a little joy in.

Teh Hardcorez

December 29th, 2008

I’ll admit that I’m surprised to see that one of my most anticipated games of the year, Prince of Persia, isn’t really selling that well. Oh, sure, it’s not selling badly per say. But it’s not moving the numbers expected of an Ubisoft flagship title around Christmas. Especially considering that it’s from a series of celebrated and favored games (where even the emo-whiny Warrior Within was, underneath it’s over-marketed bullcrap, an outstanding game from a playstyle perspective).

The one thing I’ve always liked about Ubisoft is that they aren’t afraid to screw with an established formula. Sometimes they expand upon it in small ways (as in the first few Splinter Cell titles), and sometimes they make games that are just good games – critics be damned. Beyond Good and Evil was one of these titles, if only anyone had ever played it. Other times they try something that only sort of works, as with Assassin’s Creed, and what they end up with is a very different experience that doesn’t quite fit the cookie-cutter expectations of their target audience.

Creed was by no means perfect, but it certainly didn’t deserve the hate and vitriol that the gaming community thrust upon it. People saw the promo and wanted “Prince of Persia in Jerusalem” because, for all of the community’s wailing about being given the “same old game” every year, that’s essentially what sells. Just as EA, who pumped out sequal turds until their pockets were bursting with money and are now taking a hit at the register because they finally have some unique and interesting IPs in their lineup. But what Assassin’s Creed at least tried to do was to create a new genre of game play. And yes, travel was a bit tedius, and the sword play could have actually used more Prince of Persia. But when Ubisoft got hammered with scores like in the 5-6 out of 10 range, I was admittedly baffled. Compare that with the 9.5 and 10 scores gifted to Grand Theft Auto IV which, while a very good game, is really just Grand Theft Auto III with a major graphical facelift and a more compelling main character.

What really surprised me about the new Prince of Persia is the character development, and the sheer volume of dialogue in the game. Occsaionally the Prince’s quips do get annoying, as with any gaming character. But the purely “optional” dialogue sequecnes between the Prince and Elikah are actually wonderfully done, recorded believably, and add an entirely new dimension to the game that one might dare to call “character development”. Maybe it’s a sad thing that non-cringeworthy voice acting and interesting characters are worth pointing out as an exception in a game – though they’re often the rule and not the exception for Ubisoft (yes, yes, Warrior Within, I know), and that deserves recognition. And that development is not unique to the Prince of Persia franchise. The afore-mentioned Beyond Good and Evil was filled with compelling, interesting protagonists. And hell, Sam Fisher and Irving Lambert feel more like “real” people than most television and movie characters.

One of the principle complains I kept reading was that there was no way to really “lose” in the new Prince of Persia. Technically, your character cannot die. In the event that you miss a jump or get taken down to no health by an enemy, your companion resets the encounter. In the event of the climbing sequences, she pulls you back to the last place you stood on firm ground. During battle, she resets the fight, often allowing the boss to regain a large portion of his health. And these critics are right. You cannot die in Prince of Persia. They’re also missing the bloody point.

If you want to get right down to it, you cannot die in the last three Prince of Persia games, either. For one thing, you had the time rewinding powers that let you re-try difficult jumps or undo poorly thought out attacks. And there was also a save feature in place, coyly disguised as the Prince’s faulty memory. In fact, I can’t think of any game that I’ve played in the past several years where death was any impediment to progress. All Prince of Persia does is automate the quicksave and quickload buttons so you don’t have to tap them every time you fuck up. And to be honest, the new “saving” feature actually adds some measure of challenge to the movement sequences, since you don’t get to simply rewind your mistake. You must start the entire sequence over from your safe “starting” point.

So, from a console standpoint, what they cut from the game was an annoying “death” screen that I’d see a few hundred times and a constant set of trips through the save / load menu. I can live without those things. Now, I do think that the boss fights could have been handled more appropriately. Those just seemed like an endurance match, with quicktime events popping up so often they scarecely felt like quicktime events and almost became gameplay elements. Almost. So the boss never-die feature was imperfect, and until you figure out each boss’s technique you may be fighting them for a long time. But the overall arch of the game, the style with which it was carried out, and the cleverness with which they turned the final boss fight (no spoilers) into a test of what Prince of Persia is really about as opposed to a combat twitch-fest deserves more praise, honestly, than the game has received.

Ironically, the other game on my 360′s to-beat list is Bionic Commando: Rearmed. As a huge fan of the original, I have to say it’s pretty breathtaking to see a non-franchise title receive the sort of fan service restyling that Bionic Commando did. There are plenty of elements of the game that have been updated – there are both new and improved weapons which can be hot-swapped mid-level, many of the bosses (as much as BC had them) are completely redesigned, and the bionic arm is insanely powerful in comparison to the original title. But the reason that I mention Bionic Commando is that it was traditionally a difficult game, and it still uses a “lives” system. You have a limited number of chances, per level, to not die. Failing that, you get booted out to the stage selection screen.

Of course, Rearmed uses a saved game feature, unlike the original which had to be defeated in either a single sitting or else was a slow, lurking death sentence for your NES (as the console sat on pause for hours at a time). There are no quicksaves in Rearmed, and while you can acquire extra lives, the supply is by no means infinite. Add to that the fact that several of the bosses take some practice and coordination to learn to fight. So does all of that makes Rearmed a harder game?

No, not really. It just makes it take longer to beat. As long as you have the requisite skill required to beat the trickier stages, you will eventually (by either luck or rote memory) defeat them all. You’ll figure out every swing sequence and time every bazooka shot to the point where you are killing off-screen enemies as you progress. Because the truth is that in games like Prince of Persia and Bionic Commando, where the environment is a principle enemy, your ability to move through that environment is as much a test of your gaming skill as the enemies you defeat.

And what happens in Bionic Commando is that you learn the earlier portions of the stage better than the later ones, because you have to traverse them over and over again. Death has, at least, some meaning because of the greater penalty involved. It also makes the game less enjoyable during several sequences where the game does feel as though it is punishing you for its own learning curve (including one where a boss does not count as “defeated” until his death animation completes, and should you die in that time, you still fail. . . I damn near gave up on that encounter at first because I couldn’t figure out why I was still losing). Interestingly, because of the “connected world” aspect of Prince of Persia, as well as the surprisingly enjoyable “scavenger hunt” sub-quests (and I normally hate scavenger hunt mechanics), my overall ability to move through the stages and perform the acrobatics is pretty balanced across the board – a claim I simply cannot make in regards to Bionic Commando.

Look, if your complains about the new Prince are the graphical style (though I can’t see why) or the ending (which was ridiculous, but at least different), I can see your point of view. I may disagree with it, but I can at least understand it. But if you’re bitching because the game isn’t “teh hardcorez”, then I have a suggestion for you. Every time you die, quit to the main menu and load your last saved game. There you go – artificial difficulty restored. For everyone else, I can’t recommend the new Prince of Persia enough. Give it a spin. And if you haven’t played Rearmed yet, seriously, get off your ass (I only waited so I could play it on the 360 with a proper controller). Rearmed is as much a blueprint for how to refashion a side-scrolling classic as Metroid Prime was a blueprint for how to transfer it to 3D. And I hope Capcom paid attention, because the new Bionic Commando title is on the horizon!

I’m Sick

November 20th, 2008

I’m sick of being told that America is an inert nation – a desperate scrabble-clawed lunge, the clouding breath of men who realize that the trouncing they took two weeks ago makes naked the lie that we are a nation unwilling to progress. I’m sick of hearing that a President who wins the American people by nine million votes must be cautious, but a President who wins by three million – after losing by a handful – has a mandate. I’m sick of these feckless, shallow men in empty grey suits manifesting on my television to tell me how bloody relevant their perpetually wrong opinions are. I’m sick of being told that America is a nation of limitations. Of small-mindedness. Of petty, knuckle wringing, back stabbing never-ran leaders living in infinite disconnect with the people they have promised to serve.

I’m sick of being ashamed of the things that my country does in the equatorial shadows of jingoism and false bravado. Of a government that should not, will not, and does not. Of empty smiles and tremendous egos asking me to tighten my belt because the yowling maw of imperious corruption knows no abatement. I’m sick of the very suggestion that the wholesale pillaging of my generation’s future is in our own best interest. Of the terms of our indenturement being draped in the flag of patriotism. Of being told that the bootprint on the back of my neck is some violet badge of courage.

I’m sick of the status quo being a benchmark instead of the minimum. Of the shrill chorus of hollow voices that have told us about all the things America cannot do out of one side of their mouths while attacking my love of my country out of the other. Of the audacity to mourn the passing of our darkest hours. Of the scalpel-mouthed minority staking out a surreal survival on the ragged edges of self delusion that tells me my America isn’t possible because theirs has failed them. Because theirs has failed us all.

I’m sick of being told that America cannot come together. That we are divided, sequestered by our beliefs. That the trivialities that separate us are insurmountable by the dreams that unite us. That fear of the “other” is a family value. That some damn fool ideological jigsaw puzzle version of our country, sliced along artificial borders, carved by ancient rivers, and sundered by the non-corporeal unreality of an electoral college makes us foreign to our brothers and sisters. That America must always be viewed as a Jackson Pollock in reds and blues. That I didn’t watch Americans – not liberals or conservatives, but Americans – carry their shared sorrow in buckets and their unbreakable resolve in their souls under the ghastly plumes of a mutual heartbreak.

I’m sick of being told that we cannot.

Yes we can.